PT106.S2.Q4 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

In response to Whittaker’s claim that there is no such thing as the number of medical students who drop out before the second year, Hudson similarly concludes he cannot help but become rich. As evidence, he states there is no such thing as dying before his first million dollars is in the bank.

Hudson counters the position held by Whittaker. He does this by presenting an analogous argument with an obviously false conclusion.

The analogous argument is Hudson’s comparison between there being no such thing as medical students dropping out before their second year and no such thing as himself not becoming rich.

Hudson does not cite any specific example. His analogous argument is stated generally and theoretically.

Hudson does not think that Whittaker’s conclusion is a possible situation. His analogous argument seeks to establish that Whittaker’s conclusion is absurd.

PrepTest 106 - Section 2 - Question 4

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action