For some years before the outbreak of World War I, a number of painters in different European countries developed works of art that some have described as prophetic: paintings that by challenging viewers' habitual ways of perceiving the world of the present are thus said to anticipate a future world that would be very different. ███
Other People's View ·Belief that pre-WWI paintings were prophetic
"Prophetic" meaning that they asked viewers to change the way they view the world, like these paintings were prophesying the future world to come.
Other People's View ·These painters anticipated social and political changes
Their break with tradition was so fundamental that some critics credited these artists with having anticipated political and social disruptions of WWI. Huh?
Author's Critique ·The painting's aesthetic innovations are what is most important
The author disagrees with the critics. This makes sense. It's just a weird argument that these renowned painters are remembered for... not their art but rather their social / political prophesies.
Delacroix made stylistic changes in response to (not in anticipation of) social changes.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
2.
The art critic mentioned in ███ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████████ █████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
Question Type
Implied
Other’s perspective
Glance back at the sentence and read it again if you have to. That’s our evidence for what the art critic would agree with — the prophetic power of these artworks (concerning politics and social trends) is their chief interest and value.
Anti-supported. The critic disagrees — she finds these artists important more because of there alleged power to anticipate political and social trends.
This is the closest to capturing the idea that these artists were important because of their ability to predict political and social trends. (By the way, “shrewd” means “having or showing sharp powers of judgment.”)
Too strong. The critic doesn’t think that these styles were of “little significance to the history of post WWI art.” She does think that these artists are more important because of their powers of prediction, but she can still believe they had a meaningful impact on art.
Difficulty
79% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%129
144
75%160
Analysis
Implied
Other’s perspective
Art
Critique or debate
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
0%
160
b
7%
157
c
7%
160
d
79%
165
e
6%
164
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.