For some years before the outbreak of World War I, a number of painters in different European countries developed works of art that some have described as prophetic: paintings that by challenging viewers' habitual ways of perceiving the world of the present are thus said to anticipate a future world that would be very different. ███
Other People's View ·Belief that pre-WWI paintings were prophetic
"Prophetic" meaning that they asked viewers to change the way they view the world, like these paintings were prophesying the future world to come.
Other People's View ·These painters anticipated social and political changes
Their break with tradition was so fundamental that some critics credited these artists with having anticipated political and social disruptions of WWI. Huh?
Author's Critique ·The painting's aesthetic innovations are what is most important
The author disagrees with the critics. This makes sense. It's just a weird argument that these renowned painters are remembered for... not their art but rather their social / political prophesies.
Delacroix made stylistic changes in response to (not in anticipation of) social changes.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
4.
The author presents the example ██ █████████ ██ █████ ██ ██████████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████
Question Type
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
The purpose of bringing up Delacroix is to support the line right before Delacroix is mentioned: “It is also important to remember that not all decisive changes in art are quickly followed by dramatic events in the world outside art.” Delacroix is an example of how sometimes dramatic events do not follow big changes in art.
a
Social or political ███████ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████████████
This is not the point expressed in the line immediately before the Delacroix example is brought up.
b
Artistic innovations do ███ ███████████ ██████████ ██████ ██ █████████ ██████████
This is a rephrasing of the idea expressed in the line immediately before the Delacroix example is brought up.
c
Some European painters ████ ████ ███ ██ ███████ ██████ ██ █████████ ████████
This is not the point expressed in the line immediately before the Delacroix example is brought up. In addition, the whole point of the passage is that certain artists that people think predicted social/political changes actually did not do that through their art.
d
Important stylistic innovations ███ ████ ████████ ██ ██████████ ████ ███████████
This is not the point expressed in the line immediately before the Delacroix example is brought up.
e
Innovative artists can █████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ██ █████████ ████████
If you’re tempted by this, it might be because you think it’s supported by the case of Delacroix. That’s arguably true, but there’s no reason to dwell on that issue. Even if (E) is supported, it’s not the author’s purpose in bring up Delacroix. The purpose is to illustrate the point made in the line immediately before Delacroix was mentioned. This points means that art changes are not always followed by dramatic social/political events. The point has nothing to do with what innovative artists can adapt to.
Difficulty
81% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%130
144
75%158
Analysis
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Art
Critique or debate
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
2%
153
b
81%
165
c
1%
157
d
0%
145
e
16%
161
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.