PT107.S3.Q6 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that Astorga isn’t telling voters what she’ll actually do once she’s elected. This is because she’s telling voters that she’ll do what they want her to.

The argument assumes that Astorga does not intend to do what the voters want. Without that assumption, it would be entirely possible for Astorga to intend to perform as mayor exactly how the voters have said they want her to.

The argument doesn’t need to assume that she’s incapable of doing what the voters want, only that she doesn’t intend to do what they want.

Even if the polls didn’t accurately reflect what the voters want, it could still be true that she doesn’t intend to do what they want, so this assumption isn’t necessary.

The conclusion is limited to what Astorga intends to do if elected. The likelihood of her actually being elected is irrelevant.

Astorga’s personal opinions concerning the role of a mayor are irrelevant. All that matters for the conclusion is what she intends to do if she’s elected.

This must be true in order for the conclusion to follow. If Astorga intends to do what voters want once she’s elected, then her campaign promises would be truthful.

PrepTest 107 - Section 3 - Question 6

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action