In recent years, a growing belief that the way society decides what to treat as true is controlled through largely unrecognized discursive practices has led legal reformers to examine the complex interconnections between narrative and law. ██ ████ █████ ████████ █████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ███████ █████ ███████ ███████ ██████ █████████ █████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ████████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████ ███
Context ·How do we decide what is true or false?
Legal systems use competing narratives about events; judges and juries assign "truth"
Implications of solution ·Disruption of status quo, less advantage bestowed by legal training, emphasis on empathy
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
12.
It can be inferred from ███ ███████ ████ █████████ █████ ███ ███████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ██ █ ███████ █████████ ██ █████ ███████
Question Type
Implied
Other’s perspective
The correct answer will likely be supported by P4, which describes these scholars’ view. We know they want to bring into legal discourse the language of emotion and experience.
a
incorporating into the ███ ███ ██████ ████████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ ███ ██████████
We have no evidence that the scholars want to bring into legal discourse development in psychology and philosophy. These subjects just aren’t mentioned as something they want to include.
The scholars don’t want to eliminate discourse having a particular point of view. They want to replace the abstract form of discourse with discourse based on narratives. Their problem with legal discourse isn’t about point of view; it’s about the format of the discourse.
These scholars don’t advocate more training in the forms of legal discourse. They want to replace the abstract form of discourse with discourse based on narratives.
d
making the law ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████████ ██ █ █████ ███████ ██ ██████
Supported. The scholars want to replace the abstract form of discourse with discourse based on narratives. These stories have traditionally been rejected as false because they don’t conform to the language of law. This has led legal discourse to exclude people who aren’t fluent in the language of law.
We have no evidence these scholars want to encourage appreciation of legal history and methodology. They want to replace the abstract form of discourse with discourse based on narratives.
Difficulty
85% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%128
142
75%157
Analysis
Implied
Other’s perspective
Critique or debate
Law
Problem-analysis
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
1%
165
b
9%
162
c
4%
160
d
85%
167
e
1%
161
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.