In recent years, a growing belief that the way society decides what to treat as true is controlled through largely unrecognized discursive practices has led legal reformers to examine the complex interconnections between narrative and law. ██ ████ █████ ████████ █████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ███████ █████ ███████ ███████ ██████ █████████ █████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ████████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████ ███
Context ·How do we decide what is true or false?
Legal systems use competing narratives about events; judges and juries assign "truth"
Implications of solution ·Disruption of status quo, less advantage bestowed by legal training, emphasis on empathy
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
13.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████████ ████████ ██████ █████████ ██ █████████ ████████ ███████ ████ █████ ██████████
Question Type
Author’s attitude
Implied
The author has a positive attitude toward the legal scholars’ proposals. This is evident from the last few lines of the passage, where the author no longer attributes her claims to the scholars but appears to make statements using her own voice. The author is the one who says personal narrative can create empathy and that narrative can play a positive role in the process of legal reconstruction.
a
strongly opposed
The author’s attitude toward the proposals is positive, as shown by the last few lines of the passage.
b
somewhat skeptical
The author’s attitude toward the proposals is positive, as shown by the last few lines of the passage.
c
ambivalent
The author’s attitude toward the proposals is positive, as shown by the last few lines of the passage. There’s no hint of having mixed feelings about the proposals.
d
strongly supportive
This is supported by the last few lines of the passage, where the author no longer attributes her claims to the scholars but appears to make statements using her own voice. The author is the one who says personal narrative can create empathy and that narrative can play a positive role in the process of legal reconstruction.
e
unreservedly optimistic
This doesn’t fit, because the author doesn’t assert that the proposals will definitely succeed. Rather, the author says that they “might” play a positive role, and that they “can” shatter the complacency of the legal establishment. This language shows an attitude that’s more cautious about the prospect of success than “unreservedly optimistic.”
Difficulty
72% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%125
147
75%169
Analysis
Author’s attitude
Implied
Critique or debate
Law
Problem-analysis
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
1%
159
b
2%
162
c
6%
162
d
72%
167
e
20%
165
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.