In recent years, a growing belief that the way society decides what to treat as true is controlled through largely unrecognized discursive practices has led legal reformers to examine the complex interconnections between narrative and law. ββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ
Context Β·How do we decide what is true or false?
Legal systems use competing narratives about events; judges and juries assign "truth"
Implications of solution Β·Disruption of status quo, less advantage bestowed by legal training, emphasis on empathy
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
16.
Those who reject objectivism would ββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ
Question Type
RC analogy
People who reject objectivism would believe that the βquest for truthβ canβt be achieved, because thereβs no such thing as a neutral, objective observer. Letβs look for an answer that captures the idea of attempting to do something impossible.
a
a hunt for ββ βββββββββ ββββββ
This is most analogous, because it involves an attempt to do something impossible. The people who reject objectivism regard the quest for objective truth as something impossible, because thereβs no such thing as a neutral, objective observer.
b
the search for β ββββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββββ
This doesnβt involve an attempt to do something inherently impossible. Someone searching for a valuable mineral among worthless stones is searching in the wrong place, but it might still be possible to find a valuable mineral by searching in a different location. The people who reject objectivism wouldnβt think that itβs possible to find truth by searching in the right place.
c
the painstaking assembly ββ β ββββββ ββββββ
This doesnβt involve an attempt to do something inherently impossible. This involves an attempt to do something time-consuming and difficult.
d
comparing an apple ββββ ββ ββββββ
This doesnβt involve an attempt to do something inherently impossible. Although one might be making a bad comparison, since apples and oranges are so different, itβs still possible to compare an apple to an orange.
e
the scientific analysis ββ β ββββββββ ββββββββ
This doesnβt involve an attempt to do something inherently impossible. We have no reason to think itβs impossible to scientifically analyze a chemical compound.
Difficulty
82% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%139
150
75%160
Analysis
RC analogy
Critique or debate
Law
Problem-analysis
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
82%
167
b
8%
161
c
4%
160
d
3%
161
e
4%
159
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.