In recent years, a growing belief that the way society decides what to treat as true is controlled through largely unrecognized discursive practices has led legal reformers to examine the complex interconnections between narrative and law. ██ ████ █████ ████████ █████ █████████ ███ █████ ██ █████████ ███████ █████ ███████ ███████ ██████ █████████ █████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████ ████████ ████ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████ ███
Context ·How do we decide what is true or false?
Legal systems use competing narratives about events; judges and juries assign "truth"
Implications of solution ·Disruption of status quo, less advantage bestowed by legal training, emphasis on empathy
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
16.
Those who reject objectivism would ██████ ████ █████ █████ ███ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ██████████ ██ ████ ███████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████
Question Type
RC analogy
People who reject objectivism would believe that the “quest for truth” can’t be achieved, because there’s no such thing as a neutral, objective observer. Let’s look for an answer that captures the idea of attempting to do something impossible.
a
a hunt for ██ █████████ ██████
This is most analogous, because it involves an attempt to do something impossible. The people who reject objectivism regard the quest for objective truth as something impossible, because there’s no such thing as a neutral, objective observer.
b
the search for █ ████████ ███████ █████ █████████ ██████
This doesn’t involve an attempt to do something inherently impossible. Someone searching for a valuable mineral among worthless stones is searching in the wrong place, but it might still be possible to find a valuable mineral by searching in a different location. The people who reject objectivism wouldn’t think that it’s possible to find truth by searching in the right place.
c
the painstaking assembly ██ █ ██████ ██████
This doesn’t involve an attempt to do something inherently impossible. This involves an attempt to do something time-consuming and difficult.
d
comparing an apple ████ ██ ██████
This doesn’t involve an attempt to do something inherently impossible. Although one might be making a bad comparison, since apples and oranges are so different, it’s still possible to compare an apple to an orange.
e
the scientific analysis ██ █ ████████ ████████
This doesn’t involve an attempt to do something inherently impossible. We have no reason to think it’s impossible to scientifically analyze a chemical compound.
Difficulty
82% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%139
150
75%160
Analysis
RC analogy
Critique or debate
Law
Problem-analysis
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
82%
167
b
8%
161
c
4%
160
d
3%
161
e
4%
159
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.