PT108.S1.P4.Q25 > Analytics

Hide analysis

What it means to "explain" something in science often comes down to the application of mathematics. ████ ████████ ████ ████ ███████████ ██ █ ████ ██ ████████████ ██████████ ███████████ ██ ██████ ███ ████████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ██████ ███ ███████████ ██ ████ █ ██████ ██████████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████ ████ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ █ ████ ██ █████████ █████ ███ ██████ ████████████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ █ ████████████ ███████ ████ █████████ ██ █████ ████████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ██████

Thinkers' perspective · Science is about finding a mathematical explanation for things in the world

Math is a language that can describe the world.

██ ███ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██ █████ █████████ █████ ███ ████████████ ███████ ████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ███

Question · What's the relationship between language and what it refers to?

Linguists' answers · Either language corresponds to things, or it's purely a matter of convention

Supporters of "convention" answer · Language depends on what people accept

A statement is true only when there are no plausible alternatives that might make one question it.

█████████ ████ ████████████████ █████ ████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████ █ ████████████ █████████ ███ ██ █████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ █ ██████████ ██ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ██████ █████ ██ ███████ ████████ ██ ████████████ ████████ ████ ██████████ ████ █ ███████████████ █████ ████ █████ ██████████ ██ █ ████████████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██████████████ ██████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██████████ █████ ██ ██████████████ ███████████████████████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ ███████ ██ ████████ ████ ██ ███████████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████ ██ █████████ ██ ██ ████ ██ ████ █████ ████████ ████ ██████████ ███████ █████ ███ ██████

Analogy to science · Mathematical statements about the world can be seen as true based on agreement

A more persuasive mathematical statement can come along and displace an old one.

Implication for linguists · If language is merely convention, what does it tell us about the world?

██ ███████ ███ ████████████ █████ ██ █████ ████ ███████ █████████ ██ ████ ██ ██████ ██ ████████████ ██ █ █ ██^██ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████ ████ ████ ████ █████████ ██ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ██████████ ██████████ ███ ████ ████████ ███ ███ ██ ██ █████████████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████

Analogous implication for scientists · If mathematical models/explanations are merely convention, what role do they play in scientific knowledge?

The author's main point is that we need to answer this question.

Passage Style

Critique or debate

25.

The primary purpose of the █████ █████████ ██ ██

Question Type

Purpose of paragraph

Structure

This is a Purpose of Paragraph question. This is the kind of question where we can anticipate the answer choice in low-res terms. The function of P3 is to expand on the views of the conventionalists and show how their perspective could apply to science. These linguists believe that the relationship between language and things comes from agreed-upon conventions.

offer support for ███ ████ ██ █████████ ███ ███████ ████ ████████ ███ ██ █████████ ██████████████ ██ ██████

On the contrary, the linguists in P3 hold the competing view: that language is a matter of agreed-upon conventions.

elaborate the position ██ █████████ ███ ███████ ████ █████ ██ ██████ █ ██████ ██ ██████████

This is an accurate description of the purpose of P3. The author elaborates on the conventionalist view of linguistics. Part of this elaboration includes the discussion of how the conventionalist view could apply to science.

59%

illustrate the differences ███████ ███ ████████████ ███ ███████████████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██████

The author is only concerned with explaining the conventionalist position in P3; the essentialist view is never mentioned here. The comparison between these two positions does not occur in P3.

demonstrate the similarity ██ ███ ██████████ ██████ ██ █ ███████ ██████ █████ ██████████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████████

This is descriptively inaccurate. P3 does not mention a current debate among scientists. The author explains how the conventionalist view would apply to the sciences; nothing in P3 indicates that this is a current debate happening among scientists. P3 does not serve to show the similarity between two debates; instead P3 further discuses one idea (the conventionalist view of linguistics) and how this idea could apply to the sciences.

27%

explain the theory ████ ████████████ ██████████ ███ █ ████ ██ ████████

The author does not explain this theory in P3; the author already did that in P1.

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 108 - Section 1 - Passage 4 - Question 25

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 108 - Section 1 - Passage 4 - Question 25

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?