Subscription pricing
Mario: The field of cognitive science is not a genuinely autonomous discipline since it addresses issues also addressed by the disciplines of computer science, linguistics, and psychology. █ █████████ ██████████ ██████████ ███ █ ██████ ██ ███████ ███ ███ ████
█████ █████████ ██████ ██████ ████████████ ████ ██████████ ██ █ █████████ ██████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ████ ████ ███████ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ██████ ████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ████████████ ████████████ ███ ███████████ █ █████ ██ █████ ██ █ █████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ █ ██████ ███████████ ██████ ████ ██ ██████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██████ ████ ██ █████ █████ ██ █████ ██████████
Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
Lucy denies Mario’s claim that a genuinely autonomous discipline has its own domain inquiry and instead concludes a field is autonomous by virtue of having its own methodology. As evidence, she points out that in the past Mario has acknowledged philosophy as a genuinely autonomous discipline despite also thinking philosophy addresses issues also addressed by linguistics, mathematics, and psychology.
Describe Method of Reasoning
Lucy counters the position held by Mario. She does this by pointing out that Mario has demonstrated beliefs in the past that directly contradict the principle he asserts. If Mario has believed philosophy is a genuinely autonomous discipline, then it’s not supported that a genuinely autonomous discipline must have a unique domain inquiry.
10.
Lucy responds to Mario by
a
questioning Mario's expertise ██ █████████ ███████
b
demonstrating that Mario ████████ ███ ██████ ██ █ █████ ██ █████ ████ ████ ██ █ █████████ ██████████ ██████████
c
showing that some ██ ███████ ███████ ███ ███ ██████████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██████████
d
disputing the accuracy ██ ███████ ███████████ ██ █████████ ███████ ██ ██████████ ██████ ████ █████████ ██ █████ ███████████
e
establishing that Mario ██ ███ █ ███████████