News item: The result of a recent public survey has been called into question because one of the pollsters admitted to falsifying data. ███ ██████ ██████████ █████████ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ █████ █████████ ████ █████ ██ ███████████ █████████████ ███████ █████████ ████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ █████ █ ████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ██████████ ██ ███████████ █████████████
The news item argues that the conclusion of the recent public survey, that a majority of people in the country favor investing more in information technologies, isn’t true because falsified data were included in the survey.
The news item reasons that since falsified data were included in the recent public interest survey, the survey is untrue, and we can conclude that a majority doesn’t actually favor more investment in information technologies. However, the news item’s argument is vulnerable to the criticism that just because falsified data were included in the survey, that doesn’t necessarily mean that the survey’s conclusion is untrue.
While the survey may include falsified data, It’s still possible that a majority of the people in the country favor investing more money in information technologies.
The news item's argument is ██████████ ██ █████████ ███████ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ███████████ ████
the conclusion of ███ ██████ █████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ████ ████████
the conclusion of ███ ██████ ████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████ ████ ████
other pollsters in █████ ███████ ████ ███ ████ █████████ ████
some people who █████████ ██ ███ ██████ ████ █████
people's opinions about █████████ ██ ███████████ ████████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███████