Naturalists have long studied the ability of North American forest birds to survive extremely cold overnight temperatures in winter. ███
█████ ███ ███ ███████ ███ █████ ██████ ████████ ████████ ███ ████████████ █ ██ ████ █████████ ███ ███████████ ████████ █████████ ████ ████ ████████████ ██ ██████████ ████ █████ █████████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ████████ █████ ████ ████ ██ █ ████ █████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████ █████ █████ █████ ██████████████████ ███ █████████████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ████ ████ ███ ██████ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ████ ████ ████████████ ███
███ ██████ ██████ ███████ ████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████ ████ ████ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ████ ████████ ██████ ███████ █████ ████ ████████ ███████████ ██ ████████ ███████████ ██████ ███ ██ ██ ████████ ███ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███ ███ █████ ███ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ ███████ ███ █████████ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ █████ ██████ ████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ██████ ███████████ ████ █ █████████ ███████ ████ ██████ ██ ████████ ████████ ████ ██████ ████ ██ ████ ██ ████ ███ ███ █████
█ ███████ ███████████ ██ ████ ████████ █████ ████ ███████ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ █ ████ ███
The passage suggests that the ██████ ████ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ████ ██████ ██ ████████ ███████ ████████ ██ ████ ██████ ██████ ██
The author presents the hypothesis that kinglets cluster during the night as plausible — it “may be borne out by a recent study of goldcrests.”
almost certainly true, █████ ███ █████ ████████████ ████ ████ ██████████
Too strong; the author doesn’t suggest the hypothesis is “almost certainly true.” The hypothesis “may be borne out.”
feasible given that ████████ █████ ██ ██████ ██████ ███ ███
Supported, because the author thinks the hypothesis “may be borne out,” and
a possibility that, ██████ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ████ ██ ███████
The author doesn’t suggest that the hypothesis is “unlikely” or that it is “the only option left to explore.”
well established by █ ██████ █████ ██ ██████████
Too strong; the author says the hypothesis “may be borne out” by a study on goldcrests. That doesn’t imply that hypothesis is “well established.”
the hypothesis most ██████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ █████████
No support for the claim that the hypothesis is the “most widely discussed.”