Much of mainstream thinking concerning juvenile delinquency in Canada and the United States is based on the assumption that if uncorrected it automatically leads to adult crime and should thus be severely punished, usually by some form of incarceration, before it becomes an ingrained behavior pattern. ███
███ ███████████████ █████████████ ██ ███████ ██ ██████████ █ ██████ ████ █████ ████ █████ █████████████████ █████████ ████ ██ ███ ████████████████ ███████████ ████████████ ███████ ████ ███ █████ ██████ ██████████ █████ ██ ██ ████████ ████████ ███ ████ ████ ████████ ██████ █████ ████ █████ █████████████ ████ ██ ██ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ███████████████ ████████ ████ ████ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ████████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ ██████████ ████ ████████ ████ █████ █████ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██████████ ████████ █████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ ████████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███████████████ ████ ████ ████ ██████ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ █████████ █████████ █████████████ ███ █████ ██████ ███ ██████ █████ ███████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ████ ████ ████████ █████████ ███ ██████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ████ █████ ██████████ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ███ ████ ████ █ ███████ ██ █████ ██████ ████ ████ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ███████ ███
███ ███████ ██ ████████ ███████████ █████████ █████ ██ ██ █████ █████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ██ █████████ ███ ████████████ ██████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ████ ████████ █████████ ██████████ ████ █████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██████████████ ████ ██ ████ ████████ ██████████████ ███
In relation to
The second sentence of the passage contains the criminologists’ view that incarceration might lead an offender to commit more crimes. In the fourth sentence of the last paragraph, the author suggests a potential way to handle juvenile delinquency that might avoid any negative effects resulting from incarcerating youth offenders. So the author’s purpose in relation to the second sentence is to advocate a policy based on the view expressed by the criminologists.
describe a policy ████ █████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ████ █████
The author doesn’t “take issue” with the view of the criminologists mentioned in the second sentence. The author finds the view plausible and advocates a policy based on that view.
illustrate and support █ ████████ ████ ██ █████████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████
This best captures the author’s purpose. The author finds the criminologists’ view in the second sentence plausible and proposes that we don’t incarcerate youth offenders because of that view.
provide an example ████ ████████ ████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ██ ██████████ ████████ █████████ ████████ ███████████
The fourth sentence of the last paragraph isn’t an example of mainstream thinking about juvenile delinquency. Mainstream thinking involves incarceration.
show an interpretation ██ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████████ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ███ ███████
The fourth sentence of the last paragraph doesn’t oppose anything in the second sentence of the passage.
reiterate the flaws ████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ██████████████
The fourth sentence of the last paragraph doesn’t contain any criticism of the criminologists or their method.