PT108.S4.P4.Q22

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8

PASSAGE 2

Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16

PASSAGE 3

Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24

SECTION 3 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

This doesn’t relate to either of the two points the author brought up as criticism of the anthropologists. So there’s no support for thinking the author would encourage them to apply taphonomy to modern hunter-gatherer societies. Although taphonomy is a method the author discusses later in the passage for learning about ancient societies, there’s no indication the author believes the anthropologists should use the method on modern societies.

This doesn’t relate to either of the two points the author brought up as criticism of the anthropologists. The author wants the anthropologists to study differences between modern societies and the societies of early hominids. But the similarities among the various modern hunter-gatherer societies is not relevant; (B) doesn’t involve a comparison between modern hunter-gatherer societies and ancient hominids.

This doesn’t relate to either of the two points the author brought up as criticism of the anthropologists. The author cares about the comparison between modern hunter-gatherers and prehistoric hominids. Studying hunter-gatherer societies of the “previous century” (the 1800s or 1900s, depending on when the passage was written) doesn’t involve a study of prehistoric hominids.

This doesn’t relate to either of the two points the author brought up as criticism of the anthropologists. The author cares about the comparison between modern hunter-gatherers and prehistoric hominids. (E) relates only to modern hunter-gatherers.