This principle doesn’t fit the author’s evaluation, because the author doesn’t praise merely the narrative’s ability to capture the mood of the time period. Rather, the author praises the way the narrative helped readers perceive domestic values in the context of slavery.

This principle doesn’t fit the author’s evaluation, because the author doesn’t praise merely the narrative’s ability portray the events of Jacobs’ life. Rather, the author praises the way the narrative helped readers perceive domestic values in the context of slavery.

This principle applies to the author’s evaluation, because the author emphasizes the narrative’s ability to help readers “perceive domestic values within a broader social context.”

This principle doesn’t fit the author’s evaluation, because the author doesn’t praise the narrative’s ability to take the perspective of a majority of its readers. Rather, the author praises the way the narrative helped readers perceive domestic values in the context of slavery. This involves a perspective that isn’t familiar to the majority of readers.

This principle doesn’t fit the author’s evaluation, because the author doesn’t praise merely the narrative’s use of multiple genres. Rather, the author praises the way the narrative helped readers perceive domestic values in the context of slavery.