Brewer: Conclusion All children should be given the opportunity to participate in competitive sports; these activities provide an unsurpassed opportunity to engage children's emotions and so stimulate them to put maximum effort into attaining high athletic standards.
█████████ █ █████████ ███████████ █████████ █████ ████ █████ ███████ █ ███████ ██ ██████ █████████ ████████ ████ █ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ██ █████████ ███ ████ ████████ ████ ██ █████ ███ ████████████ ███ ██ ████ ████ ███████████ █████ ████ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ██ █████████ ██████ ██████████
Brewer argues that opportunities to participate in competitive athletics should be open to all children. Polanski counters by claiming that forcing non-competitive children to compete would produce undesirable consequences.
Polanski commits a “strawman” fallacy, meaning he responds to an argument that wasn’t actually made. Brewer advocates for giving children the opportunity to compete, but never claims that anyone should be made to.
Polanski mischaracterizes Brewer’s argument by acting as though Brewer argued for forcing children to compete even if they don’t want to. We’re looking for an answer choice that describes this mischaracterization.
Polanski's response most strongly supports ███ ██████████ ████ ████████ █████████████ ██████ ██ ██ █████████ ████
characteristics acquired by ███████ ███████████ ██████ █████ ████ ████ ███ ████ ██ █████ ████
winning at competitive ██████ ██ █████████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ █████████
children should put ████ ██████ ████ ████████ ██████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ██ ████████
children should be ████████ ██ ███████████ ██ ███████████ ██████ ██████████ ██ █████ █████████
children cannot be █████████ ███████ █████ ████████ █████ ███████