PT109.S4.Q25 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22

PASSAGE 4

Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27 Question 28

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The stimulus can be diagrammed as follows:

Every contract negotiator has lied to someone, and therefore practiced deception. If a person has not practiced deception, they are not a contract negotiator.

This must be true. As shown below, by chaining the conditional claims, we see that all contract negotiators must have lied to someone and, in extension, have practiced deception.

This could be false. Practicing deception is not a sufficient condition for anything in our stimulus, which means there are no implications from knowing someone practices deception.

This must be false. Whoever lies to anyone is practicing deception.

This could be false. No information in the stimulus suggests that if someone lies to a contract negotiator they have been lied to by one in the past.

This could be false. We know that anyone who has been lied to has lied to someone, but we don’t know if this conditional relationship goes both ways, as (E) suggests.

PrepTest 109 - Section 4 - Question 25

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action