PT110.S4.P3.Q16 > Analytics

Hide analysis

Philosopher Denise Meyerson views the Critical Legal Studies (CLS) movement as seeking to debunk orthodox legal theory by exposing its contradictions. ████████ ████████ ██████ ████ ███ ██████████ ████ ██ ███ ██████████████ █████ ████ ██████ ███ ████ ███ █████████ ███ ██████ ████ ████████ █████ ██ ████████ █████ ███████

Denise Myerson's (DM) Perspective · Criticism of Critical Legal Studies (CLS)

CLS tries to show contradictions in orthodox legal theory. But, CLS points to contradictions that don't exist.

CLS Perspective (according to DM) · Conflicting values in law make law irrational

Conflicting values means there are always multiple equally plausible answers to any legal question. And, choosing one answer over another is always irrational.

DM's response · Can rank conflicting values, so different answers are not always equal

Conflicting values may lead to multiple answers, but we can sometimes rationally choose one answer over another based on ranking of values.

██ █████████ ████ █████████ ████ ████ ███ ███ █████████ ███ ███████ ███████████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ████ ███ ██████ ███████ ████ ████ ██ ███████████ ██ ███ █████████ █ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████████ ████ ███ ██ █████████████ ████████ ███████ ████ ███████ ██████ ████ ███████ ██ █████████████ ██ ███ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████████ █████████████ ██ ██████ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███████ ████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ███ ████ ███████ ████████████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██ ████████ █ ████████ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ██ █████ ████████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████████ ████ ███████████ ██████ ███ ██████ █████ ████ ███ ████ ███ ████████████ ████████████ ███████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ █ ███████ ██ ███ ███ ████ ███████ ██████ ███ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███████████

DM's additional response · Choice between equally plausible answers is not always irrational

Two answers can be equally plausible, but are both reasonable compared to a third answer.

CLS perspective (according to DM) · Legal formalism requires belief that law has moral authority

Legal formalism is the view that there's a method that can decide the correct answers to legal questions.

DM's response · Law does not need moral authority to provide unambiguous answers

Illustration: We can clearly identify the winner of game in which people try to steal the highest value item. This doesn't mean there's any moral authority in the game or the identification of the winner.

CLS's rebuttal · DM's game illustration isn't like actual legal cases

In legal cases, we have to appeal to things beyond the rules, such as the purpose of laws, and societal policies and values.

███ ████████ ███████ ████ ████ ██████████████ ███ ██ ██████ ██ ████ ███ ███ ████████ █████ ███ █████ ██ ███ █████

DM's rebuttal · The game illustration is like actual legal cases

Purpose, policies, and values can be characterized as part of the rules of the game.

Passage Style

Critique or debate

16.

The primary purpose of the █████████ ██ █ ████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ██ ██

Question Type

Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)

Structure

Meyerson uses the game as an example to show that a system can produce unambiguous results without having moral authority. She argues that this is analogous to the law— you can “play by the rules” of the legal system and get clear results, but that doesn’t mean you endorse the system.

provide an example ██ ███ █ █████████ ███ ██████████ ████ ███████

The game is presented as an analogy for the legal system. There is no previously applied principle that the game demonstrates.

demonstrate a point ██ █████ ██ ██ ███████

Meyerson uses the game as an analogy to demonstrate her point that a system can have clear rules and unambiguous results without having moral authority. You can follow the rules of a game and get a clear result without believing that the game has moral authority, and the same is true of the law.

94%

emphasize the relative ████████████ ██ ██ ████████

Meyerson isn’t arguing that the law is unimportant. Instead, she uses the game as an analogy to argue that the legal system doesn’t have to have moral authority.

contrast two situations ██ ████████████ █████ ███████████

Anti-supported. Meyerson is highlighting a similarity between a game and the law, not contrasting them. She uses the game as an analogy to argue that the legal system doesn’t have to have moral authority.

dismiss an idea ██ ██████████ ██ ██ █████████████

Too strong. Meyerson does dismiss the CLS movement’s idea, but she doesn’t argue that it’s reprehensible. She just uses the game as an analogy to show that their idea is incorrect.

PrepTest 110 - Section 4 - Passage 3 - Question 16

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action