While historians once propagated the myth that Africans who were brought to the New World as slaves contributed little of value but their labor, a recent study by Amelia Wallace Vernon helps to dispel this notion by showing that Africans introduced rice and the methods of cultivating it into what is now the United States in the early eighteenth century. ███
Conventional View / New View ·African slaves in US contributed only their labor / No, they also introduced rice cultivation
Evidence for New View ·Document with instructions to bring slaves with knowledge of rice cultivation to the New World
Document dates the instructions to 1718, decades before the arrival of the French Acadians who were previously thought to have introduced rice cultivation to the New World.
Answer 1 / Explanation ·Plantation owners also ate rice; growing rice was a relief for slaves
Plantation owners wanted to eat rice so demanded it to be grown. Growing rice was a form of relief for the slaves because they could work without supervision.
Explanation ·They transformed the land to make it their own
They did grow rice but that wasn't the point. They wanted to transform the land because they viewed the land as an extension of themselves and so wanted to take care of it and really make it theirs.
Hypothesis ·Rice cultivation may also have been a political act
Transforming the land to grow rice where previously the land was used to grown cotton is a symbolic and political act to assert their freedom and ownership over the land.
Passage Style
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
26.
The passage cites which one ██ ███ █████████ ██ █ ██████ ████ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
Question Type
Stated
The author identifies why rice cultivation after slavery is difficult to explain in P3.
a
Landowners did not ███ ████ ███ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ██████ ██████
Not stated. Although landowners during slavery did eat rice, we’re not told that they didn’t eat rice after slavery.
b
Rice was not ██████████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ██████████ ███ ███ ███ ██ ██████ ██████
Not stated. The author never compares the labor required to cultivate rice to that required to cultivate cotton. Although the author notes that the labor required to cultivate rice wouldn’t seem worth the financial benefit of cultivating rice, this doesn’t tell us anything about the comparative level of labor required to cultivate rice and cotton.
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%141
149
75%158
Analysis
Stated
Humanities
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
2%
157
b
88%
167
c
3%
159
d
4%
160
e
3%
159
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.