PT111.S3.Q10

PrepTest 111 - Section 3 - Question 10

Show summary

Goswami: Conclusion I support the striking workers at Ergon Foods. ████ ███ ██████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ████ ████ ███████ ███ █████

█████████ ██ ███ ██ ███ ██████ █ ████ █████████ ███ ███████ ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ███████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ████ ████████

Speaker 1 Summary

Goswami supports the striking workers at Ergon Foods. This is because she thinks the amount they are paid (most make less than $20,000 per year) is too low.

Speaker 2 Summary

Nordecki concludes that if the strike is about pay, he does not support the strike. This is because the average annual salary of the striking workers is above $29,000.

Objective

We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree about whether the striking workers are underpaid. Goswami thinks they are. Nordecki thinks they aren’t.

Show answer
10.

Goswami and Nordecki disagree over ███ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████

a

The average annual ██████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ████ ████████

b

Pay is the ███████ █████ ████ █████ ███ ███████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ██████

c

It is reasonable ██ ███████ ████████ ███████ ███ ███ ██████████

d

The striking workers ██ █████ █████ ███ ██████████

e

It was unreasonable ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ██ ██ ███████

Confirm action

Are you sure?