PT111.S3.Q11 > Analytics

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that even if the student promised Jeanne that he would tell the teacher Jeanne is homesick, the student should not lie to the teacher.

Why?

Because whenever people speak to each other, they make an implicit promise to tell the truth. Lying breaks that promise. (The implication is that if the student lies to the teacher, that’s breaks the implicit promise that the student will tell the truth to the teacher.)

The author assumes that the obligation to tell the truth to the teacher overrides the obligation to fulfill the promise the student made to Jeanne. (Remember, the student promised Jeanne that he would say Jeanne is home sick. Why should the implicit promise to the teacher take precedence over the explicit promise he made to Jeanne?)

Not necessary, because the argument concerns what the student SHOULD do if he made a certain promise to Jeanne. What other people actually do concerning truth-telling doesn’t affect what the student should do.

Not necessary, because we don’t know what is in Jeanne’s “best interests.” Nothing in the argument commits the author to some view about what would be the better course of action for Jeanne’s interests.

Not necessary, because the consequences of a broken promise are irrelevant to the reasoning. Although the author does believe that the student should not break the promise he implicitly makes, we have no reason to think that this has anything to do with the consequences of broken promises.

Necessary, because if it weren’t true — if NO implicit promises are worse to break than ANY explicit ones (or in other words, if every explicit promise is worse to break than every implicit promise) — then we have no reason to think the student should honor his promise to the teacher over the promise to Jeanne. The promise to the teacher is implicit; but the promise to Jeanne is explicit. The negation of (D) would imply the student should lie to the teacher in order to fulfill the promise to Jeanne.

Not necessary, because the author’s argument encourages the student to break the promise to Jeanne. So clearly the author does not have to believe that one should never break a promise.

Question

75% of people who answer get this correct

This is a moderately difficult question.

CURVE

Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right

25% 140

152

75% 165

Question Stem Tags

Necessary assumption

Stimulus Tags

Rule-application

Popularity Avg. score

156

158

160

75%

168

16%

163

You don't have any history with this question.. yet!

PrepTest 111 - Section 3 - Question 11

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action