PT111.S3.Q20

PrepTest 111 - Section 3 - Question 20

Show summary

Scientist: Some critics of public funding for this research project have maintained that only if it can be indicated how the public will benefit from the project is continued public funding for it justified. ██ ███ ███████ ████ █████ █████ █████ ████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ███ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ███ ███████ ████████████

Summary

The stimulus can be diagrammed as follows:

Notable Valid Inferences

The inference the stimulus is designed to produce is “The critics are wrong about the claim that indicating how the public will benefit is necessary for the public funding to be justified.” In other words, indicating public benefit is NOT required to justify public funding for the project.

This inference is warranted because if the critics were right, there would not be tremendous public support. But there is tremendous public support. This triggers the contrapositive and proves the critics are wrong.

Show answer
20.

If the scientist's claims are █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ████ ██ █████

a

The benefits derived ████ ███ ████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████

b

Continued public funding ███ ███ ████████ ███████ ██ ██████████

c

Public support for ███ ████████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██ ██ ██████████

d

There is tremendous ██████ ███████ ███ ███ ████████ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ ██ █████████ ███ ███ ██████ ████ ███████ ████ ███ ████████

e

That a public ███████ ███ ██ █████████ ██ ███ █ ███████████ ███ ███ █████████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████████ █████████ ██████ ████████

Confirm action

Are you sure?