The consumer price index is a measure that detects monthly changes in the retail prices of goods and services. ███ ███████ ██ ████ ██████████ ██████████ ████████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ █████ ██ ████ █████ ████████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ████████ ███ ████████ █████ █████ ████ ███ ████████ █████████████ ███████████ ████ ███ ███████████ ██████ ███ ████ ██ █████████ ████ ██████ ██████████ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ ████████ ██ █████████ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ██████
The author concludes that the value of government benefits is sometimes greater than is warranted by the true change in costs because consumer price index doesn't account for technological advances that may significantly lower production costs.
The author concludes that government benefits can sometimes be too high because the consumer price index (CPI) doesn't consider technological advances that may reduce production costs. However, he also explains that the CPI tracks changes in retail prices.
Even if production costs go down, we don't know whether this will impact retail prices. Also, the CPI still measures retail price changes, which reflects the cost of living, so production cost changes are irrelevant.
The reasoning in the argument ██ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ █████████ ████ ███ ████████
fails to consider ███ ███████████ ████ █████ ███ █████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ █████
This doesn’t explain why the argument is vulnerable to criticism. Even if there are years when there’s no change in the CPI, the author still jumps to the conclusion that government benefits are sometimes too high because they don’t account for production costs.
fails to make ████████ █████ █████ ███ ████████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ █████
The author doesn’t list every single good and service that’s included in the CPI, but this isn’t a flaw in his argument. We know that the CPI detects monthly changes in the retail prices of goods and services overall.
presumes, without providing ████████ ████ ██████████ ████████ ███ ███ █████████ ████ ██ ████████ ███████ █████
This doesn’t explain why the argument is vulnerable to criticism. Even if some people use retirement benefits to purchase unusual goods and other people don’t, the CPI is still used to account for overall changes in the average cost of living.
uncritically draws an █████████ ████ ████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ████ ████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ██████
The author doesn't draw an inference from what has been true in the past, nor does he make a conclusion about what will be true in the future. He concludes that government benefits are sometimes too high based on a claim about technology lowering production costs.
makes an irrelevant █████ ████ ██████████ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██████████ █████
The author talks about the CPI, which measures changes in retail prices. He then draws a conclusion based on technology that may lower production costs. But we have no idea whether it would impact retail prices, and the CPI accounts for changes in retail prices anyway.