Support Any writer whose purpose is personal expression sometimes uses words ambiguously. █████ ██████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███████████ ████ ██ ██████ ████████ █████████ ███████ ██ █████████ █ ███████ █████████████ ██ ████ ███ ████ ██████
Readers never need to fully understand a poem’s words to enjoy it. This is because all poets sometimes use words in a way that’s not fully clear (ambiguous). (Since all poets’ purpose is personal expression, and all writers with that purpose sometimes use words ambiguously.)
The conclusion is about readers’ enjoyment, but none of the premises mentioned that. We need to connect poets’ use of ambiguity with readers’ ability to enjoy unclear poetry. For example: if writers use words ambiguously, then their readers’ enjoyment doesn’t depend on clearly understanding all used words.
The conclusion can be properly ████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
Writers who sometimes ███ █████ ███████████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ███ ██ ██████ █ ███████ █████████████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ██████
Writers whose purpose ██ ████████ ██████████ ███ ███████████ ████ ███████ ██████ ██████ ███████ █████ ██████
No writer who ████ ████ █████ ███████████ ███ ███ ██████ █████ █████████ ███████ ██ █████████ █ ███████ █████████████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ██████
Most writers whose ████████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ █████████ █ ███████ █████████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ ███ ██████
Readers who have █ ███████ █████████████ ██ ████ █ ██████ ███ ███████ ██████ █████ █████████ ████ ████ ██████████████