PT112.S4.Q13 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

Joseph's main conclusion is that Fermat was lying or mistaken when he claimed to have proved his theorem. Joseph believes this because no one has been able to prove the theorem since Fermat's time, suggesting that it might be impossible to prove.

This is a sub-conclusion that supports Joseph’s main conclusion that Fermat was either lying or mistaken in proving his theory.

This is factually incorrect. Joesph provides support that “no one else has been able to prove it”

This is a sub-conclusion that is supported by the premise that no one else has been able to solve the theorem. Then, it supports the main conclusion that Fermat was lying or mistaken.

This is not an objection that Joseph anticipates or answers. It is a sub-conclusion on which he bases his main conclusion.

This is factually inaccurate. Joseph believes that no one else could solve this theorem. That is why he argues that Fermat was mistaken or lying.

This supports the argument’s main conclusion that Fermat was mistaken or lying. It is not just background information.

PrepTest 112 - Section 4 - Question 13

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action