Subscription pricing
Mark: To convey an understanding of past events, a historian should try to capture what it was like to experience those events. ███ █████████ █ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ████ ███████ ██████ ██████████ ████ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ███ ██ ██ ████ ████ ██ █████████ ████ ███ █████████ ████ ████████
██████ ███ ███ ██ ███ ██ █████ ████████ █████ ███████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ███████████ ████ █████ ████ ████ ██ █ ████████ ██████ ██ ██ █ ██████ ██ ██ ███████ ████████ ████ ████████ █████ ████████ █ ██████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ██ █████ █████ ██████████ ████ █████ ██ ███████ ███ █████████ █████████████████ ██ ███ █████
Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
Carla denies Mark’s claim and concludes historians must stick to general and objective characterizations of the past. To support her claim, Carla poses rhetorical questions and states that the answers would generate a biased version of history.
Describe Method of Reasoning
Carla counters the position held by Mark. She does this by posing questions Mark’s argument fails to consider and states the approach would generate biased versions of history.
10.
Carla does which one of ███ █████████ ██ █████████ ██████ █████████
a
contests Mark's understanding ██ ██████████ ██████
b
questions Mark's presupposition ████ ███ ██████ ███ ██████████ █████████ ████████
c
argues that the █████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ███ ██████ ████████ █████ ███████ ███ ██████
d
questions whether Mark ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ██ ████████
e
gives reason to ███████ ████ ██████ ██████████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████████████ █████████████