Robert: Speed limits on residential streets in Crownsbury are routinely ignored by drivers. ██████ ████████ █████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████████ ████████ ███ ███ ████ ████ ███ ████ ██████ ██████ ████████ ██ ██████ █████ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ███████ █████ █████ ███ █████ ███████ ██ █████ ████████ ██ ███████████ ███████ ██ ████ ████ ████████
███████ ████ ██ █ ███ █████ ██████ ███ ███ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ██████ ████ ███████ ██ █████ ████████ ████ ████ ███ █ █████ █████
In response to Robert’s claim that the city of Crownsbury should install speed bumps on streets to slow down speeding drivers, Sheila concludes that this approach is a bad idea. To support her claim, Sheila points out that speeding drivers can easily lose control when hitting a speed bump.
Sheila counters the position held by Robert. She does this by showing Robert’s solution to a given problem could produce undesirable consequences.
The relationship of Sheila's statement ██ ████████ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ █████████
raises the objection ████ ███ ███████ ████ █████ ██████ ██ █████████ ███ ███ ██ ██ ███████ ██ ██ █████ ██ ██ ██
argues that the ████████ ██████ █████████ ██ ██████ ██ ████ ███████████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ███
defends an alternative ██████ ██ ██████ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ███ ███ █████████ ██ ██████
concedes that the ████████ █████████ ██ ██████ █████ ██ ██████████ ███ ███████ ████ ███ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ███ █████ █████ ██ ██████
charges that Robert's ████████ █████ ████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ █████████