Anders: The physical structure of the brain plays an important role in thinking. ██ ███████████ ██████████ █████████ █████████████████████ ████ ███ ████ █████████ █████ ██ ████ ██████ █████ ███ ███████ ██████████████████ ███████ █████ █████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████
█████ █████████ ████ ███ ████ ██████████ █████ ████ ██ ██████ ███████ ███████ ███████ ██ █████ ███ ███████ ████████ ████████ ███ ████████████ ████ █████████ ████ ██████ ██ ████████ ████████ ███████ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ██████████ █ ████████ ████████ ████████ ███████████ █████ █████████ ████████ █████ ███████ ██ ███████ ██ ████ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████ ███ ██████ ██████ ███ ████████ ██████████
Yang disagrees with Anders that researchers developing thinking machines should model them on the brain’s structure. Rather, Yang concludes that that those researchers would be more successful if they focus on the brain’s function and ignore its structure. As support, Yang uses an analogy: since all flying machines modeled on birds failed, thinking machines structurally modeled on the brain are also likely to fail. While the brain’s structure may be important for the function of thinking, according to Yang, it is not essential for performing the function of thinking.
The statement in the question stem is a sub-conclusion. It is supported by the analogy about birds and airplanes, and it supports Yang’s main conclusion that researchers should focus on the brain’s function and ignore the its structure to develop a thinking machine.
The statement "thinking machines closely ███████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ██████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ ██████ █████████
the main conclusion ██ ███ ████████
a subsidiary conclusion ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ██████████
a principle of ████████ ███████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████
a particular example ████████████ █ ███████ █████
background information providing █ ███████ ███ ███ ████████