PT114.S4.Q4 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8

PASSAGE 2

Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

It would be alright if a private gas company started selling stoves and similar gas appliances. It is therefore alright that the government-owned gas company started selling stoves and similar gas appliances.

This argument draws a conclusion about what’s okay for government-owned businesses based on a claim that it would be appropriate for a private business, but doesn’t provide any explicit statement telling us that whatever is okay for a private business is also okay for a government-owned business. There’s instead only an assumption that the government-owned business doesn’t have to meet different standards from a private business. We’re looking for some principle that satisfies this assumption, and provides a connection between what is alright for a private business and what is alright for a government-owned business.

This justifies how the argument get to its conclusion - if government-owned businesses can do whatever private businesses can do, and private businesses could sell stoves, then of course government owned businesses could sell stoves.

Leads to the wrong conclusion. The argument is suggesting that the government shouldn’t worry about the complaints of merchants, because it’s alright for the government-owned business to be selling stoves.

Wrong trigger. The argument is suggesting that government monopolies do have a right to compete with private businesses - this answer choice provides the opposite.

Wrong trigger. In this case, the argument states that the owners of private companies are complaining.

Wrong trigger. This argument is about whether a government-onwed business can compete with private companies, not about competition between private companies.

PrepTest 114 - Section 4 - Question 4

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action