Self-study
P1
Donna Haraway's Primate Visions is the most ambitious book on the history of science yet written from a feminist perspective, embracing not only the scientific construction of gender but also the interplay of race, class, and colonial and postcolonial culture with the "Western" construction of the very concept of nature itself. ███████████ ██ █ ████████████ ███ ███████ ███ ████ ██████ ███████ ████████ ████ ██ ████ ████ █████████ ████ ████ ███████ █████ ████████ ███ ███████████ █████████ ███ ███████████ ███████████ ██ █████ ███████ █████ ██████ ███ ████████
Intro topic ·
Haraway's book, Primate Visions
Book on history of science written from a feminist perspective. Deals with gender, race, class, colonial stuff, and "Western" concept of nature. Book involves primatology, which the author thinks is a good subject for studying beliefs about nature and culture.
P2
█████████ ████ ███████ █████████ ██ ██ █████████ ███ ███████████ ███████████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██████ █████████████████████ ███ ███ ███████ ██████ █████████████████ ██ █████████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ███████ ██ █████ ██ ████ ██ ██ ██ ████████ ██ ██ █ █████ ██ ████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ █ ███████████ ███████████ ███ ███████████ ████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██████ ████████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ ████ ██ ██ █ ████ ████ ██ ██ ██████ ████████████ █████████████ ██ ████ ██████████████ ███████ ███ ████████ ██ ████████ ████ ███ ████ ██████████ ███████ █████ ██████ ████████████ ██████████ ██████████ █████████ ███████ ███████ ████████ ██ ████████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ████ ██████████ ███ █████████ ███████ ████████ █████ ██████ █████ ██ █████████ ██ ██████ ████████████ ██ ████████ ████ █████████ ██ █████ ███
Important feature of book ·
Challenges traditional separation between people and nature/history
Haraway's approach recognizes that nature participates in humans' creation of knowledge about nature. In other words, nature isn't just something subject to human control.
Additional important feature ·
There are only multiple, interlinked, partial realities
There isn't just one coherent reality or truth.
P3
████
Haraway's style ·
Fragmented approach to historiography that reflects the idea of multiple perspectives
This approach is different from traditional history books, which focus on narrative or on narrative with an emphasis on causation.
P4
███████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ██ ███ ███ ███ ████████████ █████ ████████ ██████ ████ ███ █████████ ███████ ███████ ██
Haraway's content ·
Mixes in broad cultural issues
She discusses science fiction, movies, TV, and comments on stuff like nuclear war. This approach ignores the distinction between things that are part of science and things that aren't.
Passage Style
Single position
Spotlight
13.
The passage is primarily concerned ████ ██████████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████
a
the roles played ██ ██████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███████████ ██ ██████████
This doesn’t capture the passage’s focus on Haraway’s book. The passage is almost entirely about Primate Visions — it’s not about primatology in general.
b
two different methods ██ ███████ ███ ███████ ██ ███████
This doesn’t capture the passage’s focus on Haraway’s book. The passage is almost entirely about arguments in, and style of, Primate Visions.
c
the content and █████ ██ █ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ ██████████ ████████ ██ ██████
This best captures the passage’s focus on Haraway’s book. It’s reasonable to characterize Primate Visions as a “proposal to reform the scientific approach to nature,” because the book
d
the theoretical bases ███ ███ ████████ ███████████ ██████████ █ ██████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ██ ███████
Haraway’s book isn’t about “the history of women in science.” It’s a
e
the effect of ███████████ █████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███████
The passage is focused on Haraway’s book. It doesn’t discuss the effects of theoretical positions on various books on the history of science. The passage is entirely about Primate Visions.