Jenkins: Conclusion Research on the properties of snow at the North Pole should be conducted in January and February. ███ ███████ ██ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ██████ ████ ███ ████ ████ ███ █████ ██ ██ █████████ ████ ████████ █████ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ██ ████ █████ █ █████ ██████ ██ ████ ███████ ███████████ ████ ████ ████ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ █████████████
███████ █ █████████ ███ ███████ ████ ██████ █████ ██ █████ ████ ██ █████ ███ ████ ███ ██ █████ ██████ ███████████ ███ ████ ████ ██ █████████ █████████ ████████ ██ ███ █████
Jenkins says that snow research at the North Pole should take place in January and February. This is supported by the claim that it’s important not to waste research money. In January and February, the snow won’t melt (so the money won’t be wasted). Waiting for a later month risks the snow melting (and the money being wasted). January and February avoid the risk of wasting money, so are the best months for research.
Lurano disagrees: the research should not be carried out in January and February. Why? Because April and May will probably still be cold enough for the snow not to melt. Also, waiting for a warmer month is safer for the researchers. According to Lurano, this outweighs any financial risk.
We need to find a disagreement. Jenkins and Lurano disagree on whether the research should happen in January and February or in warmer months.
The dialogue lends the most ███████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███████ ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ███████
there is a ███████████ ██ ████ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██████ █████ ███ ███
it is impossible ██ ███████████ ███ ██████████ ██ ████ ██ ███ █████ ████ █████ ████ ████████
funding will be ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ██ ███ █████ ████ █████ ████ ████████
the temperatures at ███ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ███ █████ ████ ███ ███ ████████████ ██ █████ ███ ███
research funding considerations ████████ ███ ████ ██ ███████████ █████ ██ ███ ████████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████