Chairperson: Conclusion The board of directors of our corporation should not allow the incentives being offered by two foreign governments to entice us to expand our operations into their countries without further consideration of the issue. ████████ █████ ██ ██ ███████████ ██ ████████ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ███████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ███████████ ███████
According to the chairperson, the board of directors should not hastily expand operations into two foreign countries, despite incentives and an opportunity to increase profits. Why not? Because both of these countries are politically unstable.
The chairperson asserts that the two countries are politically unstable, but doesn’t actually explain how that’s connected to the board’s decision of whether to expand operations. In other words, the chairperson is assuming that if a country is politically unstable, the corporation shouldn’t rush to expand into that country. The correct principle will validate that assumption.
The chairperson's reasoning most closely ████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
A corporation should █████ ██████ ██████████ ████ █████████ ████ ███ ███████████ █████████
Corporations should expand ██████████ ████ █████████ ████ █████ ██ █ ██████ ██ ██████████ ████████
Political stability is ███ ████ █████████ █████████████ ██ ████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██████████ ████ █ ████████
Corporations should always ██ ████████ █████ █████████ ██████████ ████ ███████████ ████████ ██████████
Boards of directors ██████ ██████ █████████ ████████████ ██████████ ████ ███████████ █████ ██ ██████ █████████ ███████████