Rachel: Though contemporary artists are pleased to be free of the constraints that bound their predecessors, Conclusion this freedom has caused a decline in the quality of art. █████ ███ ███ ██ ████████ ████ ████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ██████ ██████████ ███████ ███████████
██████ ██████ ████ ██████ ████ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ██ █████ ███ █████ ████ ██████ ███ ███ ███ ████████ ███ ████ ████ █████ █████ ████████ ████████████ ████████ ████ ███ ███ ████ ██████████ ██████ █████ ██████████ █████ ████ ████████████ ███ ██ █████████ ████████ ██ ███████ ████
Rachel concludes that artists’ freedom from the constraints of their predecessors has caused a decline the quality of art. This is because great art requires that artists struggle against external constraints.
James concludes that there hasn’t been a decline in the quality of art. People only think there’s been a decline, because people only remember the best artwork of the past, and have not get forgotten the inferior artwork of the present.
We’re looking for a point of disagreement. The speakers disagree about whether art today is worse than the art of the past. Rachel thinks today’s art is worse. James thinks it’s not worse.
On the basis of their ███████████ ██████ ███ █████ ███ █████████ ██ ███████████ ████ ████ █████ █████ ███████
contemporary art is ██ █████ ███████ ████ ███████ ███
contemporary artists are █████ ██ ███ ████ ███████████ ██ █████ ████████████
great art is ████████ ████ ████ ██ ██████ █████████ ███████ ███████████
inferior art from ████ ████ ██ █████████ █████████
one can correctly ██████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████