PT118.S1.Q1 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

Economist’s obsession with consumption as a measure of economic well-being prevents us from understanding true economic well-being. Why? Because we are not very satisfied by the fact that some things must be replaced.

There is more to economic well-being than consumption.

We should not define economic-well being solely in terms of consumption because we don’t get much satisfaction from replacing things we have consumed.

We don’t know whether the author believes satisfaction is possible without consumption. Rather, the author is making an argument that there’s more to satisfaction than consumption.

We don’t know whether the author believes that we cannot measure consumption accurately.

We don’t know whether the author believes modern products are designed to be discarded early.

We don’t know whether the author believes satisfaction can accurately measure economic well-being. We only know that the author believes that there’s more to economic well-being than consumption.

PrepTest 118 - Section 1 - Question 1

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action