Psychiatrist: Take any visceral emotion you care to consider. █████ ███ ██████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██ ███████ ████ ████████ ███ █████ ███ ██████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██ ███████ █████ ██████
The psychiatrist concludes that there are always situations where it’s healthy to try to express one’s anger. Why? Because for all visceral emotions, there are situations where it’s healthy to try to express them.
The argument’s conclusion is about anger, but anger is never mentioned in the argument’s premise. How to get from premise to conclusion? Based on the argument’s premise, we know that for all visceral emotions, there are situations where it’s healthy to try to express them. The conclusion of the argument would follow logically if we assume that anger is a visceral emotion.
The conclusion of the argument ███████ █████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
Anger is always ████████████
Anger is a ████████ ████████
Some kinds of ████████ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
All emotions that ███ ███████ ██ ███████ ███ █████████
An emotion is ████████ ████ ██ ██ ██ ███████ ██ ████████
