PT118.S4.Q3 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The spokesperson’s argument leads to the implicit conclusion that nylon, like cotton, is natural. How can this be? Because nylon’s main components have natural sources at their origin: nitrogen comes from the atmosphere, and petroleum comes from oil which comes from ancient plants.

The spokesperson assumes that, if a product’s main components originally come from natural sources, then the product is natural. That’s the only connection the original sources of nitrogen and petroleum have with nylon being natural.

So, we need to find a principle that affirms this assumption, and tells us that if the main components can be traced back to natural sources, that is sufficient for the resulting product to be natural.

The function a product serves being natural plays no part in the argument, so this cannot bridge between the spokesperson’s premises and conclusion.

The spokesperson never mentions the processes used in producing nylon, so this can’t help us. Also, like (C), this rule poses a necessary condition for a product to be natural, and we’re looking for a sufficient condition.

Like (B), this rule creates a necessary condition for a substance to be natural: that its components are natural. That’s the inverse of what we’re looking for, and can’t bridge to the conclusion that nylon is natural.

This is just irrelevant. Neither the idea of one substance being more natural than another, nor the idea of something having completely natural sources, figures in the argument at all.

So if nylon’s main components (nitrogen and petroleum) have natural origins, then nylon is natural. This exactly fills in the argument’s assumption, and bridges the gap from the spokesperson’s premises to the conclusion that nylon is natural.

PrepTest 118 - Section 4 - Question 3

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action