Editorialist: Despite the importance it seems to have in our lives, Conclusion money does not really exist. ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββ β βββββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββ
The author concludes that money doesnβt really exist. This is based on the following:
Money disappears if thereβs a universal loss of belief in it. (The author follows up with an illustration of this occurring in financial markets.)
The conclusion brings up the new concept of βdoes not really exist.β The premises donβt tell us how we can know that something does not really exist. To make the argument valid, we want to know that if universal loss of belief in something would make that thing disappear, then that thing does not really exist. Or, in other words, in order for something to exist, universal loss of belief in something would NOT make that thing disappear.
Analysis by KevinLin
The conclusion of the editorialist's ββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
Anything that exists βββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ
Only if one βββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββββ β βββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ
In order to ββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ
If everyone believes ββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ
Whatever is true ββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ