Clearly, Conclusion fitness consultants who smoke cigarettes cannot help their clients become healthier. ██ ████ ██ ███ ████ █████ █████ ███ ███████ ████ ██████ ██████ ████ ███ █████ ████████ ███████ ███ ██ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███ █████ ████████ ███████ ████ ██████ ████ ████ ██ ██████ ██████████
Fitness consultants who smoke can’t improve their clients’ health. Why? Fitness consultants who don’t care about their own health can’t care for their clients’ health and, therefore, can’t help their clients become healthier.
The conclusion talks about smoking, but the premises never mention smoking.
How to get from premises to conclusion? According to the premises, if a fitness consultant doesn’t care about their own health, they can’t care for their clients’ health and can’t help their clients become healthier. We can infer the conclusion if we assume that fitness consultants who smoke don’t care about their own health.
The conclusion follows logically if █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
Anyone who does ███ ████ ███ ███ ██ ███ ███ ██████ ██████ ████ ██████ ██████ ██████████
Anyone who cares █████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████ ███ ████ ██████ ██████ ██████████
Anyone who does ███ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ██ ██████ ██████ ████ ████ ██████ ██████████
Anyone who does ███ █████ █████ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███████
Anyone who cares █████ ███ ██ ███ ███ ██████ ████ ███ ██████
