Xavier: Demand by tourists in Nepal for inexpensive thangka paintings has resulted in the proliferation of inferior thangkas containing symbolic inaccuracies—a sure sign of a dying art form. █████ ██████ ████████ █████ ██ ████████ ██ █████████ ███ ████ █ ███████████ ████ ██████ ███████ ██ ██████ ████████ ████ ████ ███████████ ██████████
███████ ██ ███ ████ ███████ █████████ █████ ███████ ████ █████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ ████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ███████ █████ █████ ██████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ███████ ██ ██ ███ ████ ████████ ███ ████
Yvette implicitly concludes that, in order to prevent the thangka art form from dying out, Nepal should not prohibit thangka sales to tourists. This is based on the claims that young artists will only focus on art forms whose products can be sold to tourists, and that focused young artists are needed to prevent an art form from dying. This implies that banning thangka sales to tourists would contribute to the death of thangka art.
Yvette counters Xavier’s proposal by pointing out an unconsidered consequence of his proposal, which would actually undermine his intended goal.
Yvette responds to Xavier by
denying the existence ██ ███ ███████ ████ ████████ ████████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████████
challenging the integrity ██ ████████ ███████ ██ ███████████
arguing that Xavier's █████████ ██ ████████████ █████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ████████████ ██ ██ █████ ██ ███████
using an analogy ██ ████ █ ██████████ ████ ██ ████████████ ████ ███ ██████████ █████ ██ ██████
showing that the ████████ █████████ ██ ██████ ███ ██ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ██ █████