Ilana: Carver's stories are somber and pessimistic, which is a sure sign of inferior writing. █ ████ █████ ████ █ ██████ █████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ████████
███████ ██████ ███ ███ ██ ███ ██████ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████ ████████ ███ ███████ ███ █████████████ ██ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ███ ████ ███ ████ █████ █████████ ██████████████ ███ ███████████ ███████████
Iliana implies that Carver’s stories are poorly written. Why? Because somber and pessimistic writing is inferior, and Carver's stories are somber and pessimistic.
Gustav argues that Carver was an excellent writer. Why? Because despite the somberness and pessimism, his stories are humorous, compassionate, and beautifully structured.
We need a statement that Ilana and Gustav disagree on. They disagree that a somber and pessimistic story can be well-written. Ilana thinks that these characteristics are indicative of inferior writing. Gustav thinks that despite these characteristics, Carver was a great writer.
On the basis of their ███████████ █████ ███ ██████ ███ █████████ ██ ███████████ ████ ███████
Carver's stories are █████ █████████████
Carver's stories are ███████████ ██ █████ ██████
stories that are █████████████ ██ ██████████ ███ █████████ ███ █████████████ ██ ██████ ████████
stories that are ████ ███████ ███ ██ ██████ ███ ███████████
there are some ███████████████ ██ █ █████ ████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████████ █████