Surviving sources of information about women doctors in ancient Greece and Rome are fragmentary: some passing mentions by classical authors, scattered references in medical works, and about 40 inscriptions on tombs and monuments. ███
Intro to Topic ·Not a lot of evidence about ancient female doctors
Premise ·Scant written evidence indicatives that presence of women doctors were taken for granted
Author seems to be claiming that if it was such an odd thing for women to be doctors that surely there would have been more written about this. But that there wasn't is taken to be evidence that women doctors were nothing special.
Example ·Plato's The Republic refers to women doctors
He's was not arguing that women ought to be doctors. From his argument, we can infer that he and his society simply took it for granted that women already were doctors.
Premise ·Medical texts cited female doctors without special comment
Author takes this to be evidence that the presence of women doctors were taken for granted, that it wasn't special.
Passage Style
Single position
18.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████████ ████████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ ███████████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ██ ███ ████████
Question Type
Author’s attitude
Implied
This is an Implied question about the author’s attitude toward the surviving sources about women doctors in the ancient world. These sources are wide-ranging but fragmentary. Still, the author believes that they’re useful, and he uses them to support his argument that there were women doctors in the ancient world and they were an unremarkable part of life.
a
wary that they █████ ██ ██████████████ ███ ██ █████ ███████████ ██████
Unsupported. The author believes that the fragmentary sources are useful and that they support his argument well. He never suggests that they might be misinterpreted.
b
optimistic that with █ ████ ████████ ████████ ████ ████ █████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████ █████████ █████████
Unsupported. Even if we concede that the presence of women doctors in the ancient world constitutes a “crucial lingering question,” the author is not merely optimistic that the sources will yield answers. He’s certain that the sources prove that there were women doctors in the ancient world and that their presence was an unremarkable part of life.
c
hopeful that they ████ ████ ██ ██ ████████ █████████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████████ █████████
Unsupported. The author never suggests that he hopes these sources will eventually be accepted by historians. As far as we know, they might already be accepted as authentic documents.
d
confident that they ███ ████████ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ ███████ ██████████
Supported. The author uses the surviving sources about women doctors in the ancient world to support his entire argument. This suggests that he is confident that the sources are accurate enough to allow him to infer that there were women doctors in the ancient world and that their presence was an unremarkable part of life.
e
convinced of their ███████████████ ██ ████ █████ ███ ███ ███████████ ██ █ ███ ██████████ ████████ ███████████
Unsupported. The author doesn’t say anything about “a new historical research methodology.” He just uses the surviving sources to support his own claims that there were women doctors in the ancient world and that their presence was an unremarkable part of life.
Difficulty
75% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%137
150
75%162
Analysis
Author’s attitude
Implied
Humanities
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
9%
158
b
15%
160
c
1%
154
d
75%
165
e
1%
154
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.