Surviving sources of information about women doctors in ancient Greece and Rome are fragmentary: some passing mentions by classical authors, scattered references in medical works, and about 40 inscriptions on tombs and monuments. ███
Intro to Topic ·Not a lot of evidence about ancient female doctors
Premise ·Scant written evidence indicatives that presence of women doctors were taken for granted
Author seems to be claiming that if it was such an odd thing for women to be doctors that surely there would have been more written about this. But that there wasn't is taken to be evidence that women doctors were nothing special.
Example ·Plato's The Republic refers to women doctors
He's was not arguing that women ought to be doctors. From his argument, we can infer that he and his society simply took it for granted that women already were doctors.
Premise ·Medical texts cited female doctors without special comment
Author takes this to be evidence that the presence of women doctors were taken for granted, that it wasn't special.
Passage Style
Single position
19.
The tribute quoted in the ████ ████████ ██ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ███████ █████████ ██ ████████ ████ ██ █████ ████ █████ ███████ ██ ███████ █████ ████
Question Type
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
This question asks us about the purpose of this tribute in the broader context of the passage. In P3, the author argues that there was “a broad scope of practice for women doctors” in the ancient world. He brings up the tribute to one doctor as “savior of all through her knowledge of medicine” as evidence of the fact that some female doctors had broad medical knowledge.
a
acknowledged as authorities ██ █████ ███████
The author never argues that some women doctors were acknowledged as authorities by other doctors, so he can’t be offering the tribute as evidence in support of (A). Also, we don’t know whether other doctors had anything to do with the tribute.
b
highly educated
The woman in the tribute probably was highly educated. But the author isn’t trying to prove that women doctors were highly educated, so he can’t be offering the tribute as evidence in support of (B). Instead, the author argues that women practiced a broad range of medicine; he uses the tribute to support this point.
c
very effective at ████████ ███████
The woman in the tribute probably was very effective at treating illness. But the author isn’t trying to prove that women doctors were effective at treating illness, so he can’t be offering the tribute as evidence in support of (C). Instead, the author argues that women practiced a broad range of medicine; he uses the tribute to support this point.
d
engaged in general ███████ ████████
In P3, the author argues that there’s evidence that women doctors had a broad scope of practice beyond just midwifery. He uses the tribute to one doctor as “savior of all through her knowledge of medicine” as evidence of the fact that some female doctors engaged in general medical practice.
e
praised as highly ██ ████ ███████
The author never argues that some women doctors were praised as highly as male doctors, so he can’t be offering the tribute as evidence in support of (E). Instead, he argues that women practiced a broad range of medicine; he uses the tribute to support this point.
Difficulty
76% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%142
152
75%161
Analysis
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Humanities
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
2%
156
b
3%
157
c
16%
158
d
76%
165
e
4%
155
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.