PT123.S2.Q13 > Analytics

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8

PASSAGE 2

Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22

PASSAGE 4

Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

Just because the M group cans can’t be recycled further does not prove that there are twice as many M group cans as L group cans. It’s still possible that some aluminum from the L group was lost during the recycling process.

Even if the M group cans are lower quality than other cans, this doesn’t prove that there are twice as many M group cans as L group cans. We still don’t know whether some aluminum was lost during recycling.

In other words, no aluminum is lost when a can is recycled. Since half the aluminum in the M group came from the L group, and all L cans were recycled into M cans, and all cans use the same amount of aluminum, this guarantees the conclusion that the M group has twice as many cans.

This doesn’t guarantee that there are twice as many cans in the M group as the L group. Just because the L group cans were already made of recycled aluminum does not mean that no aluminum was lost when the L group cans were recycled into M group cans.

The argument only addresses cans made from aluminum; cans made from other materials are irrelevant. (E) doesn’t prove that there are twice as many cans in the M group.

Question explanation

Pause (K)

Seek backward 10 seconds (J)

Seek forward 10 seconds (L)

Mute (M)

Keyboard shortcuts

Play/Pause

Seek backward 10 seconds

Seek forward 10 seconds

←

Seek backward 5 seconds

→

Seek forward 5 seconds

Mute/Unmute

↑

Volume up

↓

Volume down

Speed up

Speed down

Closed-Captions On/Off

Enter/Exit PIP

Enter/Exit Fullscreen

Closed-Captions On (C)

Speed

Enter PIP (I)

Enter Fullscreen (F)

Ask a tutor

Written explanation

Question

69% of people who answer get this correct

This is a moderately difficult question.

CURVE

Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right

25% 134

143

75% 153

Question Stem Tags

Sufficient assumption

Stimulus Tags

Link assumption

Math

Popularity Avg. score

144

145

69%

153

17%

147

140

You don't have any history with this question.. yet!

PrepTest 123 - Section 2 - Question 13

Question explanation

Ask a tutor

Written explanation

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action