The question stem for this question reads,

which one of the following propositions is best illustrated by passage?

So, while it doesn't really neatly fit into any of our pre-existing logical reasoning categories,

it's kind of like a Most Strawling Supported question.

You know, to choose an answer choice here, you have to be able to back it up by saying,

you know, it's because of this stuff up here that I'm choosing this,

so the support derives from the stimulus flows into the answer choices.

So in that sense, it's like a Most Strawling Supported.

But anyway, it doesn't really matter.

This is not really different from other logical reasoning questions.

Let's read the stimulus.

That's very nice of her.

Second sentence tells us,

Why does she do it? Is it for the tax break? No, it's because she, you know, wanted to help her community.

And some members of the community have shown their support for this action by purchasing cars from Jablonski's dealership.

Well, that's really good.

She does something nice for the community, the community does something nice back to her.

So we need this thing to be an illustration of some general principle,

some general principle of which this is supposed to be a particular example.

So while this is not a really hard question, it's actually incredibly illustrative for the way the LSAT understands certain words,

and keywords, keywords that make or break answer choices.

At this point, nothing here tells you what the only way to reduce accidents,

what is through driver education program.

We don't even know if this driver education program worked to reduce accidents.

So we don't even know if one way to reduce accidents is through driver education program,

not to mention the only way.

So it's very, very wrong.

I mean, does this work? We don't really know.

This is great.

See, the couple of key...

Here, sometimes it's key.

If it has that altruistic action, altruistic actions always have positive consequences, then we don't know.

This is just one instance of an altruistic action which had a positive consequence for the person who performed them,

Jablonski, namely.

So here, the other key is the idea of...

AllSci really cares about whether you can take general phrases and pin them down to specific things.

For example, altruistic actions.

What are they talking about?

You know, like feeding baby orphan abandoned pandas or helping the homeless out to find shelter and food?

No.

See, here, the altruistic action is Jablonski donating cars to her community.

That's the altruistic action.

You got to be able to pin it down.

And the positive consequences is what?

The fact that the community is purchasing cars now from her.

For those who perform them, well, those refers to Jablonski.

So this ability to do referential phrasing.

While this question is very easy, this is a lesson that carries forward into other very difficult questions.

And it's wrong because it says most likely.

We just don't know.

I mean, you know, Jablonski obviously thinks that young drivers can benefit from this.

But are they the one...

We don't even know if Jablonski thinks that they're the ones that can most benefit or most likely to benefit from.

I don't know. Maybe she thinks that old drivers are more likely to benefit.

But for one reason or another, she doesn't want to donate to old drivers.

You know, usually...

See, contrast this with the answer choice B.

If this has said it is sometimes in one's interest to perform actions, I would drop the best because it's hard to support too.

It's sometimes in one's interest to perform actions that benefit others.

Yeah, then, you know, then this passage does illustrate that principle.

For Jablonski, it wasn't her interest to perform actions that benefited others.

And that's... we just don't know.

First of all, we don't even know if this action was successful.

Did it reduce accident statistics?

We don't know.

It did have community support, sure.

But we don't know if it's successful.

Also, we don't know if it must.

Without community support, could this still have been successful?

Sure, yeah, probably.

I don't know.

Or maybe, I should say.

But anyway, it doesn't illustrate it.