PT124.S3.Q3 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

It’s appropriate to discuss how musical knowledge has grown over time. The author supports this by citing one way that knowledge has grown and providing an example.

The conclusion is an allowance for acknowledging musical growth: “there are ways in which it makes sense to talk about musical knowledge growing over time.”

This is an altered version of a premise. We know that sounds that were avoided can now sound less dissonant; we don’t know that they were never used in the past, or that they are used today.

There’s no information about what’s pleasing to modern listeners. We can’t assume that consonant = more pleasing than dissonant.

This is part of the context that sets up an argument about musical knowledge.

This is an inaccurate rephrasing of the context.

This rephrases the conclusion that we can talk about the development of musical knowledge.

PrepTest 124 - Section 3 - Question 3

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action