PT125.S2.Q1 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that our company treats our employees fairly. This is based on the results of a survey of retirees of the company. In the survey, respondents reported that they had always been treated fairly during the course of their careers with the company.

The argument relies on an unrepresentative sample. The survey is of “retirees.” But the conclusion is about how “employees” are treated. It’s reasonable to think retirees of the company may have more positive opinions of the company, because retirees are those who have stuck with the company until retirement. It’s also reasonable to think that how retirees were treated in the past does not necessarily reflect how current employees are treated.

(A) describes circular reasoning. But the argument does not rely on a premise that restates its conclusion. The premise involves survey results. The conclusion is that “we treat our employees fairly.”

The evidence consists of survey results. There’s no reason to think that the results of the survey cannot be verified. Just count up the responses. In any case, there’s nothing flawed with relying on evidence that can’t be verified.

There’s no reason to think “fairly” is used in two different ways. Each use of “fairly” has the same definition: treated in a way that is right or just.

The argument’s conclusion is a generalization concerning how “employees” are treated. But the evidence is based on a sample of retirees — their opinion might not be representative of employees’ opinion.

The author never compares older methods to news ones. The author might believe that the same managing methods are used, and that those methods treat employees both new and past fairly.

PrepTest 125 - Section 2 - Question 1

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action