In economics, the term "speculative bubble" refers to a large upward move in an asset's price driven not by the asset's fundamentals—that is, by the earnings derivable from the asset—but rather by mere speculation that someone else will be willing to pay a higher price for it. ███ █████ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ █ ████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ███ ██ █ ████ ██ ██████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ████████ ██ █████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ██ ████ ██████ ███
Intro to Topic ·Speculative bubble
Speculation is when I buy a machine merely because I speculate that someone else is willing to pay more for the machine. If everyone thought like that, it would drive up the price of the machine. Contrast with buying a machine because I expect that the machine can produce goods that will earn a return on my investment.
Original high price of the bulb was rationale. The bulbs produced future generations of bulbs and hence produced a return on investment. It was not just speculation that someone else will be willing to pay even more for the bulb.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
25.
The passage states that Mackay ███████ █████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████
Question Type
Stated
The correct answer should be supported by P1 or P2, which are where we get Mackay’s view.
Not stated. Although Garber claimed that the rapid rise in price could have resulted from the fashionability of tulips, we’re never told Makcay’s thoughts on the fashionability of flowers and their contribution to price.
The Netherlands was ███ ████ ██████ ██ ███████████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ███ ███████████ ████████
Not supported as Mackay’s belief. We have no evidence Netherlands was “the only” center of cultivation/development of new tulip varieties in the 17th century or that Mackay believes that it was.
d
The very high ██████ ██ █████ ██ ███ ███████████████████ █████ █████ ██████ ████ ███ ███████████
Anti-supported. Mackay believes the Dutch tulip market involved a speculative bubble, which means the prices are not driven by the earnings derivable from the asset. (D) is what Garber believes, but it’s not what Mackay thinks.
Not supported as Mackay’s belief. Garber is the one who thinks people might have derived reasonable investment returns from the original tulip bulbs. But Mackay believes the tulip market involved a speculative bubble.
Difficulty
85% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%139
148
75%156
Analysis
Stated
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
3%
158
b
85%
164
c
2%
154
d
7%
157
e
2%
155
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.