In economics, the term "speculative bubble" refers to a large upward move in an asset's price driven not by the asset's fundamentals—that is, by the earnings derivable from the asset—but rather by mere speculation that someone else will be willing to pay a higher price for it. ███ █████ ████████ ██ ████ ████████ ██ █ ████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ███ ██ █ ████ ██ ██████████ ████ ███ █████ ████ ████████ ██ █████ ███ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ██ ████ ██████ ███
Intro to Topic ·Speculative bubble
Speculation is when I buy a machine merely because I speculate that someone else is willing to pay more for the machine. If everyone thought like that, it would drive up the price of the machine. Contrast with buying a machine because I expect that the machine can produce goods that will earn a return on my investment.
Original high price of the bulb was rationale. The bulbs produced future generations of bulbs and hence produced a return on investment. It was not just speculation that someone else will be willing to pay even more for the bulb.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
26.
The main purpose of the ██████ █████████ ██ ██
Question Type
Purpose of paragraph
Structure
P2 describes what happened in the Dutch tulip market in the 17th century and presents Mackay’s interpretation of those events.
Garber disagrees with Mackay regarding whether the tulip market involved a speculative bubble. So P2 doesn’t present “the facts that are accepted by all experts in the field.”
b
identify the mistake ████ ███ ███████ ███████ ███████ ███████ ████
P3 is where Garber identifies how he believes Mackay’s reasoning goes wrong. But P2 doesn’t identify any mistake in Mackay’s reasoning.
This best captures the purpose. P2 presents the basis on which Mackay makes an inference (that the Dutch tulip market involved a speculative bubble). Another scholar, Garber, disagrees with this inference. Although that disagreement is explained in P3, (C) doesn’t claim that the disagreement is presented in P2.
d
undermine the case ████ ███ ███████ █████ ███ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███████ ███████ █████████
P2 doesn’t involve any undermining of Mackay’s view. P2 simply presents the facts underlying Mackay’s view and Mackay’s interpretation of those facts.
P2 doesn’t involve any criticism of Mackay’s view. P2 simply presents the facts underlying Mackay’s view and Mackay’s interpretation of those facts. In addition, Garber doesn’t accuse Mackay of making any factual errors. Rather, Garber takes a different interpretation of the same facts that Mackay used.
Difficulty
84% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%139
148
75%157
Analysis
Purpose of paragraph
Structure
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
6%
159
b
3%
157
c
84%
164
d
5%
156
e
2%
154
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.