This rule triggers: we know appliances are a type of belonging that prospective buyers might assume would be included in a sale. And it also bridges to the right conclusion, that sellers then have a moral obligation to inform prospective buyers of their intention.

The real estate agent concedes that large appliances are not permanent fixtures, and never indicates that buyers might assume otherwise. This also doesn’t address the issue of whether or not the sellers are keeping the appliances. So, this rule doesn’t bridge the gap.

This gets to the wrong conclusion: the real estate agent never claims that sellers are ever morally obligated to include any appliances, just to inform buyers if they won’t be including appliances.

The real estate agent never brings up the idea of sellers deliberately misleading buyers, so this rule is just irrelevant.

This rule doesn’t trigger, because the real estate agent never discusses the situation of a seller indicating that an appliance is included. It also gets to the wrong conclusion, about selling appliances rather than just about informing buyers.