If one has evidence that an act will benefit other people and performs that act to benefit them, then one will generally succeed in benefiting them.
The stimulus gives us a principle expressed as a conditional statement:
If you have evidence that it will benefit others and you intend it to benefit others, then an action will generally be successful in benefiting them.
We need to find the correct application of this conditional statement. The right answer will feature three elements:
(1) An action intended to benefit others
(2) Evidence that the action will be successful
(3) The action then likely benefiting others
Which one of the following ββββ βββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββ
A country's leaders ββββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ β βββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ β ββββββββββββββ
Wrong trigger. Diplomatic ties could benefit others by preventing war, but the leaders didnβt pursue diplomacy to benefit othersβthey did it to get reelected.
A government study βββββββββ ββββ β ββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ
Wrong conclusion. We want a situation where an action is successfulβnot one where it isnβt. The new registration procedure failed to benefit others, so this is the opposite of what weβre looking for.
Betsy overheard a βββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββ β βββββββ βββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββ β βββββββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββββ
Betsy had evidence from a contractor that changing the filter would improve the furnaceβs efficiency, and she regularly did this for her daughterβs benefit. This benefited her daughter by removing the need to maintain the furnace, which matches our principle.
Sejal learned in β ββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ β ββββββββ βββββββββββ
Wrong conclusion. The sufficient condition is satisfied since Sejal had evidence that confronting her friend would work, and she wanted to help her friend, but we donβt know whether she was successful.
Zachary hoped that βββββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββ β ββββββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββββ
Wrong trigger. Zachary wanted to benefit his parents, but he had no evidence that therapy would work.