One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. ███
Foundation of science ·Experimental results are credible only if they are replicable
Replicable = doing experiment again leads to same result.
Problem ·Somm. and Ott (S and O) came up with a new physical system
In this system, the tiniest change in starting conditions can change results radically. (What does this mean? Not sure.) This system can be represented by a computer model involving a particle's motion within a force field. (Not sure what this means either.)
Definition of riddled basins ·Can't predict where water will flow for some points in between basins
The boundaries between these basins are riddled with physical irregulataries, which is why you can't tell where the water will flow. Need to spill the water at a point and observe. If you spill at any other point, even one right next to it, the water might flow toward a different body of water.
S and O's system ·The riddled boundary expands to every single point
So, rather than just the boundary line between two bodies of water being riddled, every point in the whole system is riddled. You can't tell even the general destination of a particle from any starting point.
Implication of S and O's system ·Other similar systems might exist, and if so, this would question the replication requirement
It's possible that some experiments can't be replicated because even the slightest, unnoticeable change in starting conditions leads to different results.
Passage Style
Problem-analysis
Single position
23.
The discussion of the chaos ██ ████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ██ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████
Question Type
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Notice what the author discusses immediately before mentioning chaos. She describes Sommerer’s and Ott’s model, in which it’s impossible to predict the general destination of the particle (along with the exact destination and the path the particle will take). This type of uncertainty is different from “chaos,” in which we can predict the general destination, even if we can’t predict the exact destination and path. The author’s intention by making this distinction is to show that the uncertainty involved in Sommer’s and Ott’s model is even higher than that of chaos, because we can’t even predict the general destination.
Sommerer’s and Ott’s system isn’t a riddled basin of attraction. The basin of attraction is a metaphor to help us understand the uncertainty that exists in their system. But their system is not itself a riddled basin of attraction. So when the author discusses the distinction between Sommerer’s and Ott’s system and chaos, we’ve moved past discussion of physical irregularities and riddled basins; the distinction has nothing to do with those things. The distinction has to do with the level of uncertainty in Sommerer’s and Ott’s system.
Sommerer’s and Ott’s system isn’t a riddled basin of attraction. The basin of attraction is a metaphor to help us understand the uncertainty that exists in their system. But their system is not itself a riddled basin of attraction. So when the author discusses the distinction between Sommerer’s and Ott’s system and chaos, we’ve moved past discussion of physical irregularities. Sommerer’s and Ott’s system does have fractal properties, but it doesn’t necessarily have physical irregularities. Physical irregularities are things that do create fractal properties in a riddled basin of attraction, but as mentioned above, Sommerer’s and Ott’s model is not itself a riddled basin of attraction.
c
emphasize the large ██████████ ██ █ ███████ █████ ██ ██████████ ████ ████████ ████████████████
Sommerer’s and Ott’s system isn’t a riddled basin of attraction. The basin of attraction is a metaphor to help us understand the uncertainty that exists in their system. But their system is not itself a riddled basin of attraction. So when the author discusses the distinction between Sommerer’s and Ott’s system and chaos, we’ve moved past discussion of actual riddled basins of attraction; the distinction has nothing to do with actual riddled basins of attraction.
d
emphasize the degree ██ ████████████████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ █████
This best captures the purpose of mentioning chaos. She describes Sommerer’s and Ott’s model, in which it’s impossible to predict the general destination of the particle (along with the exact destination and the path the particle will take). This type of uncertainty is different from “chaos,” in which we can predict the general destination, even if we can’t predict the exact destination and path.
e
emphasize the number ██ ███████ ██████████ ██ █ ███████ █████ ██ ██████████
Sommerer’s and Ott’s system isn’t a riddled basin of attraction. The basin of attraction is a metaphor to help us understand the uncertainty that exists in their system. But their system is not itself a riddled basin of attraction. So when the author discusses the distinction between Sommerer’s and Ott’s system and chaos, we’ve moved past discussion of actual riddled basins, and the purpose of mentioning chaos wouldn’t be about actual riddled basins of attractions.
Difficulty
72% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%145
154
75%164
Analysis
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Problem-analysis
Science
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
7%
157
b
7%
160
c
8%
157
d
72%
165
e
6%
159
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.